Legal Review Of Fictitious Transactions On Marketplace (Tokopedia Voucher Case Study)

Authors

  • Amin Thohari Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Dr. Soetomo Surabaya Author
  • Vieta I Cornelis Universitas Dr. Soetomo Surabaya Author
  • Siti Marwiya Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Dr. Soetomo Surabaya Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62872/vsk4dc68

Keywords:

Marketplace, Fictitious Transactions, Vouchers

Abstract

This study discusses cases of fictitious transactions through the misuse of vouchers on e-commerce platforms. The perpetrators use various methods to create fake transactions such as creating fake accounts, using stolen identities, and manipulating vouchers. This research not only provides in-depth insight into the modus operandi of perpetrators and system weaknesses, but also helps to develop more effective law enforcement strategies and more comprehensive policies. The formulation of this research problem is: 1) What is the validity and strength of evidence in civil disputes related to fictitious transactions on the Tokopedia marketplace? 2) What is the legal review of the agreement and responsibilities of the parties in fictitious transactions on the Tokopedia marketplace? This study uses normative research to understand, interpret, and evaluate applicable legal norms. Based on the analysis and case studies that have been conducted, it is found that the strength of evidence in civil disputes related to fictitious transactions is greatly influenced by several main factors, namely the authenticity, integrity, relevance, and reliability of electronic evidence. The implementation and settlement of civil disputes related to fictitious transactions on Tokopedia involves cooperation between e-commerce platforms, consumers, and lawyers to collect legal evidence, conduct mediation, and, if necessary, take litigation routes to demand the restoration of consumer rights in accordance with the provisions of civil law

Downloads

References

Journal

Ardiputra, S., Burhanuddin, B., AR, M. Y., Maulana, M. I., & Pahruddin, P. (2022). Sosialisasi UU ITE No. 19 Tahun 2016 dan Edukasi Cerdas dan Bijak dalam Bermedia Sosial. Jurnal Abdi Masyarakat Indonesia, 2(2), 707–718.

Azhar, M. (2020). Konsepsi Bai Salam Dalam Transaksi Jual Beli Online (Studi Kasus Marketplace Tokopedia).

Azzani, I. K., Purwantoro, S. A., & Almubaroq, H. Z. (2023). Urgensi Peningkatan Kesadaran Masyarakat Tentang Kasus Penipuan Online Berkedok Kerja Paruh Waktu Sebagai Ancaman Negara. NUSANTARA: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 10(7), 3556–3568.

Bahtiar, R. A. (2020). Potensi, Peran Pemerintah, dan Tantangan dalam Pengembangan E-Commerce di Indonesia [Potency, Government Role, and Challenges of E-Commerce Development in Indonesia]. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Kebijakan Publik, 11(1), 13–25.

Budiman, A. B., & Iwan, I. (2023). Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pelaku Usaha yang Dirugikan Akibat Adanya Ulasan Negatif Fiktif Ditinjau dari Fatwa DSN MUI No 24 Tahun 2017 (Studi Kasus Pada Aplikasi Google Maps). UNES Law Review, 6(2), 5263–5273.

Hikmatulloh, R., & Nurmiati, E. (2020). Analisis Strategi Pencegahan Cybercrime Berdasarkan UU ITE Di Indonesia (Studi Kasus: Penipuan Pelanggan Gojek). Kosmik Hukum, 20(2), 123–129.

Indah, F., Sidabutar, A. Q., & Nasution, N. A. (2023). Peran Cyber Security Terhadap Keamanan Data Penduduk Negara Indonesia (Studi Kasus: Hacker Bjorka). Jurnal Bidang Penelitian Informatika, 1(1), 57–64

Personal, I. (2018). Legality of Electronic Evidence in the Criminal Justice System. Lex Renaissance, 3(1), 4.

Pribadi, I. (2018). Legalitas Alat Bukti Elektronik Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Lex Renaissance, 3(1), 4.

Putri, N. C. R., Fauzi, A., Ali, M. K., Ramadhan, N. A., Salsabilla, P. J., Cahya, L. J., & Ernawati, F. A. (2024). Strategi Peningkatan Keamanan Data Pelanggan dalam Penjualan Online di Tokopedia. Jurnal Siber Multi Disiplin, 2(1), 54–67.

Rahmalia, S., Ariusni, A., & Triani, M. (2019). Pengaruh Tingkat Pendidikan, Pengangguran, Dan Kemiskian Terhadap Kriminalitas Di Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan, 1(1), 21–36.

Salle, S. (2020). Sistem Hukum dan Penegakan Hukum. CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn).

Setiawan, A. (2019). Law Enforcement in the Investigation of Narcotics Abuse Civil Disputes. Journal of Law, 35(2), 145–164.

Setiawati, D., Sholahudin, I., Nurfattah, H., Sari, N. A., & AP, S. D. (2023). Transformasi Teknologi dalam Hukum Dagang Internasional: Regulasi dan Penyelesaian Sengketa di Era Digital. Borobudur Law and Society Journal, 2(5), 220–231.

Wibowo, A., Wangsajaya, Y., & Surahmat, A. (2023). Pemolisian Digital dengan Artificial Intelligence. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada-Rajawali Pers.

Laws and Regulations:

1. Undang-Undang Dasar 1945;

2. Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik;

3. Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik;

4. Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2024 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik;

5. Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen;

6. Peraturan Menteri Komunikasi dan Informatika Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi dalam Sistem Elektronik;

7. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 71 Tahun 2019 tentang Penyelenggaraan Sistem dan Transaksi Elektronik;

8. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPer)

Downloads

Published

2024-12-27

How to Cite

Legal Review Of Fictitious Transactions On Marketplace (Tokopedia Voucher Case Study). (2024). Ipso Jure , 1(11), 28-34. https://doi.org/10.62872/vsk4dc68