Board Of Directors Accountability In Good Business Practice

Authors

  • Erwin Syahruddin Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62872/wvyd3x83

Keywords:

Accountability, Acquit et de Charge, Board of Directors

Abstract

In a Limited culpability Company (PT), where directors are frequently held responsible for their acts pertaining to the company's administration, this study examines the legal concerns surrounding the board of directors' culpability. This obligation may result in civil liability, criminal liability, or even removal from office. Finding the legal void surrounding acquit et de charge (free from liability) under Law No. 40/2007 on Limited Liability Companies (UUPT), which does not specifically govern the procedure, is the primary goal of this study. This study employs the normative technique, which focuses on examining relevant laws and regulations, specifically the UUPT, as well as jurisprudence and doctrine pertaining to the Board of Directors' liability. Using this method, the study discovered that while the Company Law governs the Board of Directors' power and duty, there are no explicit guidelines governing the acquit et de charge process in PT's Board of Directors' accountability process. This creates ambiguity in the way the Board of Directors' responsibility to the General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) is implemented and raises the possibility of power abuse that could hurt family members. In order to give the Board of Directors legal certainty and fairness in the performance of their obligations, this conclusion necessitates additional regulation of the absolve et de charge mechanism.

Downloads

References

Agustinus Simanjuntak, Hukum Bisnis, sebuah pemahaman integratif antara hukum dan praktik bisnis, Depok, Rajawali Pers, 2018, Hal 2.

Ahmad Yani dan Gunawan Widjaja, Op,cit, hlm. 116.

Anita Khoerunnisa, “Kasus E.C.W Neloe”, diakses dari http://anita khoerunnisa.blogspot.com/2016/01/ecw-neloe.html?m=1, pada tanggal 27 juni 2023

Australian The Corporation Act 2001

Bernard S. Black, The Principles Fiduciary Duties of Board of Directors, 3rd Asian

Bhakti Moelyono Arief, 2015, Pembebasan Tanggung Jawab Hukum Bagi Direksi Perseroan Terbatas.TesisFakultas Hukum Uiniversita Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, h. 7.

Blackstone Press Limited, 2001, hlm 492

Buana Perjuangan Karawang, Volume 1 Nomor 1, 2016

Collin, P.H. 1999, Dictionary Of Law 2nd Edition, Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers, United State Of America, h. 75

Corporation Act Section 8.30. Darian M. Ibrahim, Individual or Collective Liability for Corporate Director, Iowa Law Review, Vol. 93. 2008, hal. 933 dan 945

Eko Priyono, Agus Surono, Sadino, 2022.”Doktrin Business Judgement Rule Dalam Memberikan Perlindungan Hukum Kepada Direksi BUMN (Studi Kasus PT PLN), (Jurnal Hukum dan Kesejahteraan Universitas Al Azhar Indonesia, Vol. VII, Nomor 02, Juli 2022), https://jurnal.uai.ac.id/index.php/JMIH/article/view/1264 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.36722/jmih.v7i2.1264 , diakses pada 19 Maret 2023

Erman Rajagukguk, Nyanyi Sunyi Kemerdekaan Menuju Indonesia Negara Hukum Demokratis, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, (Depok : Lembaga Studi Hukum dan Ekonomi, 2006), hal. 390

Frank H. Easterbrook and Daniel R. Fischel, The Economics Structure of Corporate Law,(Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991), hal. 91.

Garner,Bryan A. 1999, Black’s law Dictionary, West Group, United State Of America, h.24

Gita Wanda Sesara, 2020, Konsep Penerapan Prinsip Business Judgement Rule Pada Keputusan Direksi Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN), (Jurnal Program Magister Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Volume 1 Nomor 1 (Maret 2020) 213-225) https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/dharmasisya/vol1/iss1/32 , diakses pada 19 Maret 2023

Gunawan Widjaja, 2008, Risiko Hukum Pemilik, Direksi dan Komisaris¸ Jakarta, Forum Sahabat.hlm 80

Gunawan widjaya, 150 Tanya Jawab Tentang Perseroan Terbatas, Forum Sahabat, 2008, Hal. 65

H.M.N. Purwosutjipto, Pengertian Pokok Hukum Dagang Indonesia, dikutip dari Ridwan Khairandy Perseroan Terbatas Doktrin, Peraturan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan, dan Yurisprudensi Edisi Revisi, (Ctk. Kedua, Total Media, Yogyakarta, 2009), hlm. 1.

Hendra Setiawan Boen. Bianglala Business Judgment Rule, Cetakan Pertama, Jakarta: PT Tatanusa, 2008, hal. 100

Hertiawan, Penerapan Doktrin Business Judgment Rule di Indonesia, https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/penerapan-doktrin-ibusiness-judgment-rule-i-di-indonesia-lt62565dbe855a0/ , diakses pada 22 maret 2023

Hotasi Nababan. Hukum Tanpa Takaran: Penjara Korupsi Bagi Korban Penipuan. Jakarta: Q Communication, 2015, hal. 114

https://www.islampos.com/kepemimpinan-dalam-al-quran-242443/ diakses pada 14 Januari 2023

I.G. Rai Widjaya, Hukum Perusahaan Perseroan Terbatas, Megapoint, Jakarta, 1996, hlm. 64

Immanuel Rivanda S, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, USU Press, Medan, hal 20

Indriyani Kusumawati, Yeti Sumiyati, 2021, Penerapan Prinsip Business Judgement Rule Terhadap Direksi Atas Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Karyawan Karena Menetapkan Diskon Pembelian Emas Antam Secara Sepihak. (Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Dan Investasi, Volume 13 Nomor 1, November 2021, p. 097-112) DOI: https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v13i1.3880 , diakses pada 19 Maret 2023

Kusmono, 2016 “Pembelaan Melalui Prinsip-Prinsip Business Judgement Rule Bagi Direksi BUMN Persero Bila Terjadi Kerugian” (Jurnal Informasi Keuangan Dan Akuntansi, Vol 3 Edisi Maret), https://jurnal.pknstan.ac.id/index.php/JIA/article/download/36/26/130, DOI: https://doi.org/10.31092/jia.v3i0.36 , diakses pada 19 Maret 2023

Kuswiratmo,Bonifasius Aji. 2016, Keuntungan Dan Resiko Menjadi Direktur, Komisaris dan Pemegang Saham , Visimedia, Jakarta, h. 12

Laporan Keuangan Perusahaan Publik”, Jurnal Fakultas Hukum, Universitas

Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2003 Nomor 70, Tambahan Lembaran Negara

Muhammad Gary Gagarin Akbar, “Business Judgement Rule sebagai Perlindungan Hukum bagi Direksi Perseroan dalam Melakukan Transaksi Bisnis”, Jurnal Justisi Ilmu Hukum Universitas

Muhammad Gary Gagarin Akbar, 2016, Business Judgement Rule Sebagai Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Direksi Perseroan Dalam Melakukan Transaksi Bisnis, (Jurnal Justisi Ilmu Vol 1, N0 1), https://journal.ubpkarawang.ac.id/index.php/JustisiJurnalIlmuHukum/article/view/77 DOI https://doi.org/10.36805/jjih.v1i1.77 , diakses pada 19 Maret 2023

Muhammad Hafizh Akram, Nisriina Primadani Fanaro, 2019, Implementasi Doktrin Business Judgement Rule Di Indonesia.(Ganesha Law Review, Volume 1 Issue 1, May), https://ejournal2.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/GLR/article/view/21, DOI https://doi.org/10.23887/glr.v1i1.21 , diakses pada 19 Maret 2023

Mulhadi, 2010, Hukum Perusahaan Bentuk-Bentuk Badan Usaha Di Indonesia, Ghalia Indonesia, Bogor, h. 105

Nalendra Pradipto, Clara Renny Kartika, Agung Jaya Kusuma 2022, Pemberhentian Terhadap Direksi Perseroan Terbatas Dalam Kepailitan Melalui Circular Resolution (Jurnal Suara Hukum, Volume 4 Nomor 1) https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/suarahukum/article/view/13022/7747 . diakses pada 10 Januari 2022

Ningrum Natasya Sirait, Hukum Kontrak Bisnis, USU Press, Medan, 2017, hal 60

Rachmadi, Dimensi Hukum Perusahaan Perseroan Terbatas. Bandung: Alumni. 2004. Hlm. 50

Re Emerging Communication, Inc. Shareholders Litigation, No. Civ.A 16415, 2004 WL 1305745 (Del. Ch. May 3, 2004) Republik Indonesia Nomor 4297.

Ridwan Khairandy, 2013, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Dagang Indonesia, cetakan ke-1, FH UII Press, Yogyakarta, hlm .109, dikutip dari Bryan A. Garner, Black’s Law Dictionary, Eight Edition, (St.PaullMinn: West Publishing Co, 2004), hlm 110

Robert Charles Clark, Corporate Law, New York: Aspen Publisher, 1986, hal. 123.

Robin Panjaitan, Martono Anggusti, Roida Nababan, 2021.Penerapan Prinsip Business Judgement Rule Terhadap Direksi Yang Melakukan Kebijakan Yang Merugikan Perusahaan (Patik Jurnal Hukum, Volume 10 Nomor 01 April 2021 Page : 1 - 14). DOI https://ejournal.uhn.ac.id/index.php/patik . diakses pada 19 Maret 2023

Ronny Hanitijo, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, (Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia, 2000), hlm.24

Roundtable on Corporate Governance, Singapore April 2001, hal. 200

Rumata Rosininta Sianya, 2018, „Tanggung Jawab Direksi atas

Rumata Rosininta Sianya, 2018, „Tanggung Jawab Direksi atas Laporan Keuangan Perusahaan Publik”, Jurnal Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Sumatera Utara

Rumata Rosininta Sianya, 2018, „Tanggung Jawab Direksi atas Laporan Keuangan Perusahaan Publik”, Jurnal Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Sumatera Utara

Stephen W. Mayson, Derek French, dan Christoper L. Ryan, Company of Law, London :

Sumatera Utara, Sumatera Utara.

Susan Ellis Wild, 2006, Webster’s New World Law Dictionary, Canada, Wiley Publishing, Inc, hlm 58.

Tuti Rastuti, Seluk Beluk Perusahaan & Hukum Perusahaan, op.cit, hlm. 136.

Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas. Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor: 4756

Undang-undang Nomor 40 tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas

Wawancara dengan Bapak Dave Njikuluw, Direksi PT Weida Terang Lintas Fantasi, Jakarta Utara, pada tanggal 02 Mei 2023, Pukul 11.00

Winardi, Asas-asas Manajemen, Bandung: Alumni, 1983, hal. 98

Downloads

Published

2025-01-27

How to Cite

Board Of Directors Accountability In Good Business Practice. (2025). Ipso Jure , 1(12), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.62872/wvyd3x83