Forming an Ethical Mindset: Applying Constructivist Learning to Teach Anti-Corruption Education in Junior High Schools

Authors

  • Luh Wayan Yasmiatti Doctoral Program in Education, Postgraduate Program, Ganesha University of Education, Bali Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62872/yw3yz151

Keywords:

Anti-Corruption, Constructivism, Learning Theory

Abstract

Corruption is a widespread problem that disrupts the stability and progress of a country, including Indonesia, and undermines the economy and public trust. Education is essential to tackle corruption from an early age to foster a culture of integrity and ethical behavior. In this article, we talk about how constructivist learning theory can be used to teach anti-corruption education in junior high schools. The purpose of this study is to show how important constructivist methods such as experiential learning, value-based education, role play, and discussion are in encouraging moral reasoning and civic responsibility among young students. Recent studies on constructivist pedagogy and anti-corruption education were collected through literature review methodologies. The findings suggest that constructivism promotes deeper moral engagement and better critical thinking, which is essential for understanding and combating corrupt behavior. In addition, students internalize anti-corruption principles through real-world scenarios, discussions, and community projects. As this study shows, the constructivist approach offers a promising platform for teaching anti-corruption education because it allows students to participate in the learning process interactively and think critically. This study shows that schools should prioritize a constructivist approach in equipping students with the moral competencies necessary to build a non-corrupt society

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alatas, V. (2019). Corruption in Asia: Rethinking the role of economic development. Routledge.

Amineh, R. J., & Asl, H. D. (2015). Review of constructivism and social constructivism. Journal of Social Sciences, Literature and Languages, 1(1), 9–16.

Arifiyanti, J., Suhartini, E., Mulyono, J., & Hutama, P S. (2022, December 13). Pendidikan Anti Korupsi pada Mahasiswa: Pendisiplinan Tubuh dan Tantangan Sengkarut Perilaku. , 2(03), 490-496. https://doi.org/10.47709/educendikia.v2i03.1910

Association for Experiential Education (AEE). (2011). What is Experiential Education? Boulder, CO: Association for Experiential Education.

Ayu, R F K., Nafiah, N., Rahayu, D W., & Akhwani, A. (2022, April 30). Implementation of Anti-Corruption Values Through Extracurricular Activities in Elementary School: Literature Reviews. Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya, 7(01), 85-96. https://doi.org/10.33086/ehdj.v7i01.2721

Banks, J. A. (2008). Diversity, group identity, and citizenship education in a global age. Educational Researcher, 37(3), 129-139.

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

Berkowitz, M. W., & Bier, M. C. (2005). What works in character education: A research-driven guide for educators. Washington, DC: Character Education Partnership.

Boehm, A. (2015). Social policy and social work: Theories of caring, ethics, and empowerment. Routledge.

Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington, D.C.: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.

Braguinsky, S., & Myerson, R. (2007). A macroeconomic model of corruption. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2005.01.003

Braguinsky, S., & Myerson, R. (2007). A macroeconomic model of corruption. Journal of Economic Theory, 135(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2006.04.002

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brookfield, S. D., & Preskill, S. (2005). Discussion as a way of teaching: Tools and techniques for democratic classrooms (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Buckingham, D. (2003). Media education: Literacy, learning and contemporary culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Crick, B. (1998). Education for citizenship and the teaching of democracy in schools. Final report of the Advisory Group on Citizenship. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.

Dillon, J. T. (1994). Using discussion in classrooms. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2009). Active learning: An introduction. ASQ Higher Education Brief, 2(4), 1-5.

Freeley, A. J., & Steinberg, D. L. (2013). Argumentation and debate: Critical thinking for reasoned decision making (13th ed.). Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Hapsari, D I., Utomo, S D., & Suhartono, E. (2020, October 19). Media Pembelajaran Hidden Curriculum terhadap Pendidikan Anti Korupsi. State University of Medan, 12(2), 417-417. https://doi.org/10.24114/jupiis.v12i2.17924

Hayati, A A., & Kurniawan, D T. (2020, May 10). Dolanan bocah caruban nagari sebagai upaya pembinaan nilai antikorupsi siswa sekolah dasar. State University of Yogyakarta, 17(1), 81-93. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v17i1.28034

Hidayah, N P., & Esfandiari, F. (2022, May 31). Upaya Menumbuhkan Nilai-Nilai Anti Korupsi Pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. , 5(1), 77-88. https://doi.org/10.15294/jphi.v5i1.53774

Hobbs, R. (2010). Digital and Media Literacy: A Plan of Action. Washington, D.C.: The Aspen Institute.

Itin, C. M. (1999). Reasserting the philosophy of experiential education as a vehicle for change in the 21st century. Journal of Experiential Education, 22(2), 91-98.

Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robison, A. J., & Weigel, M. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Jeong, S. H., Cho, H., & Hwang, Y. (2012). Media literacy interventions: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Communication, 62(3), 454–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01643.x

Kaufmann, D., & Vicente, P. C. (2011). Legal corruption. Economics & Politics, 23(2), 195–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0343.2010.00377.x

Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(1), 51-60.

Khan, M. H. (2019). The anti-corruption agenda, civil society, and the backlash against democracy. Democratization, 26(7), 1215–1231. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1589898

Kirschenbaum, H. (1995). 100 ways to enhance values and morality in schools and youth settings. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Klitgaard, R. (2015). Addressing corruption together. OECD Publishing.

Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193-212.

Komalasari, K., & Saripudin, D. (2015). The role of multicultural education in fostering students' values in anti-corruption education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2462–2467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.916

Komalasari, K., & Saripudin, D. (2015). Value-based interactive multimedia development through integrated curriculum to foster students' anti-corruption character. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 1502–1509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.783

Krismanto, W. (2023, July 18). Teacher Professional Learning In The Perspective Of Educational Technology. , 11(1), 21-21. https://doi.org/10.31800/jtp.kw.v11n1.p21--46

Kristiono, N., Munandar, M A., Wiranto, G H., & Uddin, H R. (2020, January 1). The Implementation of Anti-Corruption Education in Texmaco Vocational High School Pemalang. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200320.040

Lickona, T. (1991). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. New York: Bantam Books.

Michael, J. (2006). Where's the evidence that active learning works? Advances in Physiology Education, 30(4), 159-167.

Nasar, Ismail (2024) Exploring Modern Educational Theories: Aliterature Review Of Student Learning In The Digital Age. International Journal Multidisciplinary Science (IJML).

Nurhidayati, E. (2017, January 20). Pedagogi Konstruktivisme dalam Praksis Pendidikan Indonesia. Universitas Mathla'ul Anwar Banten, 1(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.30653/001.201711.2

Osler, A., & Starkey, H. (2006). Education for democratic citizenship: A review of research, policy and practice 1995–2005. Research Papers in Education, 21(4), 433-466.

Piaget, J. (1970). Genetic epistemology. Columbia University Press.

Potter, W. J. (2004). Theory of media literacy: A cognitive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.

Rahayu, D P., Puspita, A M I., & Puspitaningsih, F. (2020, November 20). Keefektifan Model Project Based Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Sikap Kerjasama Siswa Sekolah Dasar. , 7(2). https://doi.org/10.25134/pedagogi.v7i2.3626

Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.

Rose-Ackerman, S., & Palifka, B. J. (2016). Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Saputra, D., Suryanti, N M N., & Malik, I. (2023, May 30). Penerapan Model Problem Based Learning Berbantuan Learning Journals Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Sosiologi Kelas XI IPS 1 SMAN 1 Praya. , 8(2), 1020-1024. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v8i2.1354

Schunk, D. H. (2020). Learning theories: An educational perspective (8th ed.). Pearson.

Serra, D., & Wantchekon, L. (2012). Experimental research on corruption: Introduction and overview. In D. Serra & L. Wantchekon (Eds.), New advances in experimental research on corruption (pp. 1–13). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0193-2306(2012)0000015013

Snider, A., & Schnurer, M. (2006). Many sides: Debate across the curriculum. New York: International Debate Education Association.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Sumantri, S., Wiyono, H., & Nurhesti, N. (2023, June 30). Social Studies Education as a Strategy in Building Anti-Corruption and Anti-Drug Character in Junior High School. , 13(1), 140-149. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpi.v13i1.1008

Tika, N R., Montessori, M., & Ersya, M P. (2022, October 5). Penguatan Nilai-Nilai Antikorupsi Peserta Didik dalam Pembelajaran PPKn. , 5(4), 430-437. https://doi.org/10.24036/jce.v5i4.709

Transparency International. (2015). The global corruption report: Education. Transparency International.

Transparency International. (2022). Corruption perceptions index 2022. Transparency International. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2022

UNESCO. (1998). Citizenship education for the 21st century. Paris: UNESCO.

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2018). Education for justice: A comprehensive educational tool to prevent crime and promote a culture of lawfulness. UNODC.

Vlaicu, R., Verhoeven, M., Grigoli, F., & Mills, Z. (2019). The political economy of fiscal transparency and independent fiscal institutions. International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513512391

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Zare, P., & Othman, M. (2013). Classroom debate as a systematic teaching/learning approach. World Applied Sciences Journal, 28(11), 1506-1513.

Zulqarnain, Z., Ikhlas, M., & Ilhami, R. (2022, June 25). Perception of college students on civic and anti-corruption education: Importance and relevance. , 8(1), 123-134. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v8i1.854

Downloads

Published

2024-10-26

How to Cite

Forming an Ethical Mindset: Applying Constructivist Learning to Teach Anti-Corruption Education in Junior High Schools. (2024). Journal of Pedagogi, 1(5), 74-88. https://doi.org/10.62872/yw3yz151