Neuroscience Organizational Behavior for Employee Development Program

Authors

  • Anne Gracia Rachel Kaliey Yayasan Andhara Talli Panthea, Indonesia Author
  • Rivo Panji Yudha Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62872/x2z14q34

Keywords:

Neuroscience, Organizational Behavior, Neurocognitive Profiling, Human Resource Development, Adaptive Behavior

Abstract

In the era of digital transformation, global organizational dynamics have become increasingly complex, highlighting the misalignment between human resource management and neurocognitive adaptability. Conventional management approaches often overlook the role of brain functions in influencing employee behavior and decision-making. This study explores organizational behavior through a neuroscience lens to identify behavioral patterns that can inform effective employee development programs. A qualitative exploratory case study design was employed, involving ten informants comprising HR managers, unit heads, and operational staff from a technology-driven service company. Participants were selected using purposive sampling based on criteria such as work experience and managerial involvement. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, participant observation, and organizational document analysis. Thematic analysis was conducted through a six-phase process: data familiarization, initial coding, theme identification, theme review, theme definition, and report generation. Data validation was ensured through triangulation, peer debriefing, and member checking. The analysis yielded six key themes: (1) Work experience as a cognitive foundation, where senior employees demonstrated quicker and more intuitive decision-making; (2) Adaptive organizational behavior, characterized by flexible task allocation and informal team collaboration; (3) Varying effectiveness of managerial interventions, dependent on clarity and contextual relevance; (4) Awareness of the importance of neurocognitive profiling, yet lack of formal assessment implementation; (5) Hierarchical dynamics in decision-making, with senior staff often dominating discussions; and (6) Emotional and social support as crucial elements of team resilience. These findings underscore the gap between cognitive awareness and the systemic integration of neuroscience in organizational practice. Neuroscience offers a compelling framework for understanding and managing organizational behavior. Integrating neurocognitive profiling into human resource strategies has the potential to improve decision-making, team dynamics, and the precision of intervention programs. The study recommends developing brain-based assessment systems to foster adaptive, evidence-driven, and personalized workforce management in evolving organizational settings.

Downloads

References

Arshad, F. et al. (2023) ‘Impact of respect, equity, and leadership in brain health’, Frontiers in Neurology. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1198882.

Austin, R. D. and Pisano, G. P. (2017) ‘Neurodiversity as a competitive advantage’, Harvard Business Review.

Becker, G. S. (1975) ‘Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education, Second Edition’, in Human capital: A theorical and empirical Analysis.

Becker, W. J. and Cropanzano, R. (2010) ‘Organizational neuroscience: The promise and prospects of an emerging discipline’, Journal of Organizational Behavior. doi: 10.1002/job.668.

Biswas, S. (2015) ‘Book Review: Focus: The Hidden Driver of Excellence’, Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective. doi: 10.1177/0972262914567804.

Cacioppo, J. T. and Berntson, G. G. (2013) Social Neuroscience: Key Readings, Social Neuroscience: Key Readings. doi: 10.4324/9780203496190.

Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G. and Prelec, D. (2014) ‘Neuroscience: How Neuroeconomics Can Inform Economics’, Journal of Economic Literature.

Corr, P. J. et al. (2016) ‘Neuroscience of motivation and organizational behavior: Putting the reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) to work’, Advances in Motivation and Achievement. doi: 10.1108/S0749-742320160000019010.

Creswell, W. J. and Creswell, J. D. (2018) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative adn Mixed Methods Approaches, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling.

Debelak, K., Penger, S. and Grah, B. (2022) ‘Leadership in an Ageing Society and the Brain: Applying Neuroscience to Leadership’, ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion. doi: 10.54820/entrenova-2022-0007.

Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. (1985) Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior, Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7.

Edmi Edison, R. et al. (2019) ‘Transformational Leadership and Neurofeedback: The Medical Perspective of Neuroleadership’, International Journal of Organizational Leadership. doi: 10.33844/ijol.2019.60317.

Gino, F. and Staats, B. R. (2012) ‘The Microwork Solution: A New Approach to Outsourcing Can Support Economic Development—and Add to Your Bottom Line’, Harvard Business Review.

Healey, M. P. and Hodgkinson, G. P. (2015) ‘Toward a theoretical framework for organizational neuroscience’, Monographs in Leadership and Management. doi: 10.1108/S1479-357120150000007002.

Howard-Jones, P. A. (2014) ‘Neuroscience and education: Myths and messages’, Nature Reviews Neuroscience. doi: 10.1038/nrn3817.

Kleynhans, D. J., Heyns, M. M. and Stander, M. W. (2022) ‘Authentic leadership and flourishing: Do trust in the organization and organizational support matter during times of uncertainty?’, Frontiers in Psychology. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.955300.

Knights, J. (2019) ‘The neuroscience of leadership’, in Leading Beyond the Ego. doi: 10.4324/9781315178806-4.

Lieberman, M. D. (2020) Social: Why Our Brains Are Wired To Connect, Crown Pubhlisher.

McKee, A., Boyatzis, R. and Johnston, F. (2008) ‘Becoming a Resonant Leader: Develop Your Emotional Intelligence, Renew Your Relationships, Sustain Your Effectiveness’, Harvard Business School Press Books.

Ontario Public Service (2016) ‘21st Century Competencies’, Towards Defining 21st Century Competencies for Ontario.

Organ, D. W. (1997) ‘Organizational citizenship behavior: It’s construct clean-up time’, Human Performance. doi: 10.1207/s15327043hup1002_2.

Pieter Sahertian (2010) ‘Perilaku Kepemimpinan Berorientasi Hubungan Dan Tugas Sebagai Anteseden Komitmen Organisasional, Self-Efficacy Dan Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB)’, Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan.

Pincus, J. H. (2008) ‘The Brain That Changes Itself: Stories of Personal Triumph From the Frontiers of Brain Science’, Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease. doi: 10.1097/nmd.0b013e31817d2a8d.

Pulakos, E. D. et al. (2000) ‘Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance’, Journal of Applied Psychology. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.612.

Rock, D. et al. (2012) ‘The SCaRF model stands for Status SCARF in 2012: updating the social neuroscience of collaborating with others’, NeuroLeadership Journal.

Sorge, A. and Hofstede, G. (1983) ‘Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values.’, Administrative Science Quarterly. doi: 10.2307/2393017.

The American Institute of Stress (2023) Workplace Stress | The American Institute of Stress, The American Institute of Stress.

Waldman, D. A., Ward, M. K. and Becker, W. J. (2017) ‘Neuroscience in Organizational Behavior’, Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113316.

Weitz, K. (2015) ‘The neuroscience of organisational culture’, Library of Professional Psychology.

Zak, P. J. (2018) ‘The neuroscience of high-trust organizations’, Consulting Psychology Journal. doi: 10.1037/cpb0000076.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-27

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Neuroscience Organizational Behavior for Employee Development Program. (2025). Journal of Public Health Indonesian, 2(1), 43-57. https://doi.org/10.62872/x2z14q34