The Concept of Bargaining for Punishment in Resolving Corruption Cases Drived by Technological Developments

Authors

  • Angga Aldilla Gussman Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Jambi Author
  • Usman Usman Dosen Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jambi Author
  • Elly Sudarti Dosen Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jambi Author
  • Sahuri Lasmadi Dosen Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jambi Author
  • Herry Liyus Dosen Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jambi Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62872/1dmfwz07

Keywords:

Bargaining for Punishment, Corruption Case Resolution, Technology and the Law

Abstract

The development of information technology has provided new challenges in the fight against corruption, especially in terms of technology-based crimes that are difficult to detect. This research aims to analyze the application of the concept of bargaining for punishment in handling digital corruption cases and evaluate the challenges and benefits arising from its application. The method used in this research is a literature study and analysis of applicable legal concepts in the context of technology-based crimes. The results show that the application of this mechanism can accelerate the process of disclosing corruption cases involving technology, by offering incentives to reduce sentences to defendants who are willing to cooperate. However, the application of this concept also faces a number of challenges, such as the potential for abuse of the justice system, the complexity of obtaining valid evidence, and the need for regulatory updates and capacity building of law enforcement agencies. Overall, while bargaining for punishment offers great potential to accelerate the disclosure and recovery of state losses, its success relies heavily on the integrity of the legal system and strict oversight.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Book

Ghufron, N. (2015). Whistleblower Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana.

Indonesian Corruption Watch, Satu Dekade Pengadaan Barang/Jasa di Indonesia, Antikorupsi: Jakarta, Hlm. 54

Napitupulu, D. R. W. (2010). KPK in Action. PT Niaga Swadaya

Pusat Pelaporan dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan, Penilaian Risiko Indonesia Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Tahun 2021, PPATK: Jakarta, Hlm. 76

Ramadhana, K., Tamara, S., Aulia, Y., & Antikorupsi, M. (2022). Studi konflik kepentingan anggota legislatif terkait bisnis sumber daya alam.

Sagala, M., Djamhari, E. A., Yuniawan, W., & Hanim, S. (2023). Aliran Keuangan Gelap pada Sektor Perikanan dan Pertambangan Batu Bara serta Produk Turunannya di Indonesia. Perkumpulan PRAKARSA.

Setiadi, H. E., & SH, M. (2017). Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu dan Sistem Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Prenada Media.

Tarmizi, R. (2024). Bab 3 Blockchain Dan Keamanan Finansial. Manajemen Keuangan Di Era Digital, 27.

Journal Article

Alawiyah, S., & Bakhtiar, H. S. (2025). Peranan Bukti Digital Forensik dalam Pembuktian Penganiayaan Berat Berencana Kasus Terdakwa Mario Dandy Satriyo Dkk Terhadap David Ozora. Journal of Multidisciplinary Inquiry in Science, Technology and Educational Research, 2(1), 234-249.

Anggun, L. (2022). Perkembangan Kejahatan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dan Tindak Pidana Pendanaan Terorisme (TPPU Dan TPPT) Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Technology and Economics Law Journal, 1(1), 5.

Awaka, M. Q., & Alhadiansyah, A. (2023). Utilization of Digital Forensics in Proving the Crime of Disseminating Indecent Videos Through Facebook Social Media in the Legal Area of West Kalimantan Police. Jurnal Hukum Sehasen, 9(2), 455-470.

Chrismonita, V. N., Dewi, D. A. S., Suharso, S., & Budiharto, B. (2020). Efektivitas Permendagri Nomor 7 Tahun 2019 tentang Pelayanan Administrasi Kependudukan Secara Daring (Studi di Disdukcapil Kota Magelang dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Good Governance). Borobudur Law Review, 2(2), 64-89.

Ismail, M. (2023). Digital Policing; Studi Pemanfaatan Teknologi Dalam Pelaksanaan Tugas Intelijen Kepolisian untuk Mencegah Kejahatan Siber (Cybercrime). Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian, 17(3), 15-15.

Nurhalimah, S., Monica, T. H., Graciella, B. A., Hutabarat, B. K. S., Nathalia, B., Qurnia, N., & Yudistira, M. A. (2024). Analisis Swot Peranan Ppatk Dalam Melakukan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan Yang Mencurigakan Dan Studi Kasus. Journal of Social and Economics Research, 6(1), 1913-1930.

Nurlette, F. V. (2023). Konsep Pertanggungjawaban Pidana bagi Affiliator Binary Option Trading Kaitannya dengan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Indonesia).

Sulastri, M., Claudia, T. C., & Safira, W. C. (2023). Optimalisasi Metode Digital Forensik Sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Aset Negara Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Bentuk Bitcoin. Padjadjaran Law Review, 11(1), 1-12.

Tempo.com, “BSSN: 361 Juta Serangan Siber ke Indonesia” https://www.tempo.co/ekonomi/bssn-361-juta-serangan-siber-ke-indonesia-120095 diakses pada 25 November 2024

Transparency International, “Indeks Persepsi Korupsi Indonesia 2022 Mengalami Penurunan Terburuk Sepanjang Sejarah Reformasi” https://transparansi.id/indeks-persepsi-korupsi-indonesia-2022-mengalami-penurunan-terburuksepanjang-sejarah-reformasi-2/ diakses pada 25 November 2024

VOI, “Laporan Terbaru, Tahun 2021 Aksi Pencucian Uang Lewat Kripto Makin Marak” https://voi.id/teknologi/128462/laporan-terbaru-tahun-2021-aksi-pencucian-uang-lewat-kripto-makin-marak diakses pada 25 November 2024

Zakaria, A. P. (2024). Penyidikan Tppu Narkotika Terhadap Perusahaan Yang Di Buat Oleh Tersangka Narkotika. Jurnal Hukum dan Kebijakan Publik, 6(3).

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2024-12-13

How to Cite

The Concept of Bargaining for Punishment in Resolving Corruption Cases Drived by Technological Developments. (2024). Ipso Jure , 1(10), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.62872/1dmfwz07